squakez commented on issue #4179: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/4179#issuecomment-1492076483
> if the kameletbinding get translated to binding, then argocd would probably detect a drift and re-apply the kameletbinding resulting in a ping-pong scenario Do you think it would help if both `KameletBinding` and `Binding` will coexist? I mean, whoever is creating a `KameletBinding` will still see that resource, but internally Camel K would use a `Binding`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
