timothydilbert commented on issue #4130:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/4130#issuecomment-1472438378

   As I'm not experienced enough yet, I'm not able to comment on the 
difficulty/permissions required to check the internal registry. Hopefully, that 
changes shortly as I become more familiar with the project.
   
   If permissions/difficulty checking the internal registry is an issue. 
Perhaps including logic that would attempt a KameletBinding immediately after 
the Camel K Operator installation could be an acceptable workaround? Basically, 
there would be logic in the Camel-K Operator installation that would 
immediately try to deploy a generic (and temporary) KameletBinding. If the 
KameletBinding deployment fails with the same message, then you know it is 
because of an incomplete/unconfigured internal registry. Just offering a scotch 
tape solution as a last resort.
   
   Enhancing the documentation to spell that out would be good.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to