oscerd commented on PR #9389:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/9389#issuecomment-1447766741

   > A list of questions and TODOs related to this component that we must 
resolve before merging
   > 
   > Discuss:
   > 
   > * The `Tracer` abstraction from Camel has a notion of only high 
cardinality tags, we are missing low cardinality tags for metrics (that means 
that metrics will not have any tags at this point)
   > * Are the changes in the `Tracer` in the `tracing` component acceptable?
   > 
   > TODO:
   > 
   > * [ ]  Spring Boot Starter is missing
   
   This is not a problem, we could do that later
   
   > * [ ]  Polish the documentation
   
   This could be done with a subsequent PR
   
   > * [ ]  Currently the behaviour is almost identical to OpenTelemetry one, 
that requires the presence of custom handlers - I'm considering to remove them 
so that the additional code will not be necessary. That will mean that with 
Micrometer Observation with OTel Tracer the spans will be a little bit 
different than with the OpenTelemetry component
   
   On this, I'm not really sure about it: if we goes this way it's important to 
document and notes the difference, otherwise users might think the result will 
be the same with Micrometer and Opentelemetry and it won't be the case
   
   > Recrated from #9377
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to