squakez commented on PR #4021: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/4021#issuecomment-1415372113
> Your idea is great however it is scoped to Camel K 2.0 while I would expect a solution for Camel K 1.17, don't you believe that it could be an acceptable approach for 1.17? I guess you mean `1.12.0` (1.17 is the runtime). It could work, but mind that we could apply an heavy refactoring when moving to 2.0. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
