cmoulliard commented on issue #3501: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3501#issuecomment-1401517376
> Probably a silly question but isn't this what the [Service Binding Operator](https://github.com/redhat-developer/service-binding-operator) was suppose to do ? Or is this just a better way of achieving binding ? Thanks! FYI, we are working to improve the Service Binding concept which is not so easy to be used (as mentioned by Luca) due to lack of discovering capability, registration of services, easy way to declare the parameters to bind, ... This is why we are working on a new project called [Primaza](https://github.com/halkyonio/primaza-poc/) aimed to improve the service binding, which could be designed (perhaps) top of dapr, .... in order to benefit from some of their features such as: - [Service invocation](https://docs.dapr.io/developing-applications/building-blocks/service-invocation/service-invocation-overview/): discovery, etc - [Secret management](https://docs.dapr.io/developing-applications/building-blocks/secrets/secrets-overview/) (to better secure the data of a connection by example): - [Binding](https://docs.dapr.io/developing-applications/building-blocks/bindings/bindings-overview/ ): To be investigated ! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
