astefanutti commented on issue #3967: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/3967#issuecomment-1376861917
@lburgazzoli I think that makes very much sense. I'd favor option 2, so that neither layers have to cope with detecting the message format, that is, `message` is left unstructured, following k8s convention, and the new `details` field is structured. Possibly, that new field could even be "fully" structured, that is not JSON serialised, and could be closed to the `HealthCheckResponse` type. The only subtlety is for reporting technical issues that may occur while probing the runtime. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
