tadayosi commented on PR #3376: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/pull/3376#issuecomment-1225224395
> but camel-k-runtime doesn't have any reason to live without camel-k Yes, right, but my point is that if we release camel-k-runtime separately users could serve themselves for upgrading the runtime to a more secure one if they are concerned with any CVEs. Right now they have to wait for a main Camel K release to receive the latest patches for the runtime. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
