tadayosi commented on issue #2473: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2473#issuecomment-893307059
Yes, my goal is to adapt it as a GH action and run it in a CI workflow. > Also, out of curiosity, does the monitoring stack come out of the box (in the openshift-monitoring namespace)? In reality, the out of the box configuration is quite austere like this: ``` $ k get po -A NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE kube-system kube-flannel-ds-m6d8g 1/1 Running 0 6d21h kubevirt-hostpath-provisioner kubevirt-hostpath-provisioner-5jf7c 1/1 Running 0 6d21h openshift-dns dns-default-qtpk2 3/3 Running 0 145m openshift-ingress router-default-78d9fc46bb-nz8tk 1/1 Running 0 6d21h openshift-service-ca service-ca-66bcdfc59-wbtg2 1/1 Running 3 6d21h ``` By default it's far from fully functional OCP environment. That's another reason why we might need to wait for https://github.com/redhat-et/microshift/issues/144 to be done from Microshift side. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org