tadayosi commented on issue #2473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/2473#issuecomment-893307059


   Yes, my goal is to adapt it as a GH action and run it in a CI workflow.
   
   > Also, out of curiosity, does the monitoring stack come out of the box (in 
the openshift-monitoring namespace)?
   
   In reality, the out of the box configuration is quite austere like this:
   ```
   $ k get po -A
   NAMESPACE                                   NAME                             
     READY   STATUS             RESTARTS   AGE
   kube-system                                 kube-flannel-ds-m6d8g            
     1/1     Running            0          6d21h
   kubevirt-hostpath-provisioner               
kubevirt-hostpath-provisioner-5jf7c   1/1     Running            0          
6d21h
   openshift-dns                               dns-default-qtpk2                
     3/3     Running            0          145m
   openshift-ingress                           router-default-78d9fc46bb-nz8tk  
     1/1     Running            0          6d21h
   openshift-service-ca                        service-ca-66bcdfc59-wbtg2       
     1/1     Running            3          6d21h
   ```
   By default it's far from fully functional OCP environment. That's another 
reason why we might need to wait for 
https://github.com/redhat-et/microshift/issues/144 to be done from Microshift 
side.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@camel.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to