jamesnetherton commented on pull request #2845: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/pull/2845#issuecomment-867445005
While this no doubt works fine, I wonder if starting & managing our own Undertow server at runtime is an optimal solution. Can we not leverage the existing `quarkus-undertow` APIs like `ServletBuildItem` etc, and register the Servlet + any other required bits at build time? Then let Quarkus manage the server in a more optimised way. I'm happy to be convinced otherwise if others disagree, but managing our own HTTP server feels wrong to me. Maybe we can have this as an interim solution and follow up with improvements. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
