This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

nferraro pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/camel-k.git

commit 9fe31636911874aff86301d57128ee90dd238eda
Author: John Poth <poth.j...@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Wed Dec 16 12:50:04 2020 +0100

    Leverage Quarkus' Service Binding support #13617
---
 proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc 
b/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc
index 41941ac..809b110 100644
--- a/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc
+++ b/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ The proposed architecture is illustrated in the diagram below:
 
 image::assets/service-binding.svg[Camel K Integration Service Binding]
 
-where the `Secret` created by the _Service Binding Operator_ holds the binding 
information. The `Integration` could then reference these properties just like 
any other `Secret` properties. A special mapping may be created by Camel-k to 
avoid the user having to reference the `Secret` name in their configuration e.g 
just `{DB_PORT}` instead of `{secret:secret-name/DB_PORT}`.
+where the `Secret` created by the _Service Binding Operator_ holds the binding 
information. Quarkus' Service Binding 
https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/13617[support] could then be 
leveraged to configure the `Integration`.
 
 The steps `2-4` would not happen if the `ServiceBinding` is created beforehand.
 

Reply via email to