This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. nferraro pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/camel-k.git
commit 9fe31636911874aff86301d57128ee90dd238eda Author: John Poth <poth.j...@gmail.com> AuthorDate: Wed Dec 16 12:50:04 2020 +0100 Leverage Quarkus' Service Binding support #13617 --- proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc b/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc index 41941ac..809b110 100644 --- a/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc +++ b/proposals/service-binding/service-binding.adoc @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ The proposed architecture is illustrated in the diagram below: image::assets/service-binding.svg[Camel K Integration Service Binding] -where the `Secret` created by the _Service Binding Operator_ holds the binding information. The `Integration` could then reference these properties just like any other `Secret` properties. A special mapping may be created by Camel-k to avoid the user having to reference the `Secret` name in their configuration e.g just `{DB_PORT}` instead of `{secret:secret-name/DB_PORT}`. +where the `Secret` created by the _Service Binding Operator_ holds the binding information. Quarkus' Service Binding https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/issues/13617[support] could then be leveraged to configure the `Integration`. The steps `2-4` would not happen if the `ServiceBinding` is created beforehand.