lburgazzoli commented on pull request #557: URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k-runtime/pull/557#issuecomment-730220209
> @lburgazzoli I did ask for feedback on the name. But, Claus was the only one who responded with a +1, so here we are. smile > Oh, I've missed it > I agree that in principle, the wrap mechanism works in non-kamelet contexts too. Do you foresee it being used for anything else in let's say the next year or two? Even if it is, there is no harm in carrying along the kamelet prefix, sort of an origin story of where this component came from. WDYT? I do agree, there's no harm in renaming it as you proposed but to avoid a second rename, let just take one or more days and see if we can find a better name, if not, let's go with `kamelet-reify` :) ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
