jamesnetherton commented on issue #1144:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus/issues/1144#issuecomment-701919634


   The slightly tricky aspect to this is preserving the camel-quarkus behaviour 
where the attachments support is optional.
   
   Before I try to figure out how to implement that on the Camel side, do we 
actually need (or want) to continue doing that. The overall saving on the 
native image footprint seems trivial to me (500 - 600KB).
   
   @lburgazzoli @ppalaga WDYT?


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to