nicolaferraro commented on issue #1676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/camel-k/issues/1676#issuecomment-683799191
Can we have something like this instead:
```yaml
apiVersion: camel.apache.org/v1alpha1
kind: KameletBinding
metadata:
name: twitter-directmessage-source
spec:
configuration:
key: value
user: my-user
password: just-provide-it-in-plain-text-for-now
source:
ref:
apiVersion: camel.apache.org/v1alpha1
kind: Kamelet
name: twitter-directmessage
sink:
ref:
apiVersion: messaging.knative.dev/v1alpha1
kind: InMemoryChannel
name: twitter
```
There are multiple reasons:
- The configuration I propose is compatible with the JSON schema exposed by
the Kamelet definition (so it can be validated), while the array of
configuration items is not
- We currently don't support per-property secret entries iirc, but only
global secrets and it seems not easy to create them now, considering also that
kamelet properties are locally scoped
Wdyt @lburgazzoli ?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
