This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

krathbun pushed a commit to branch 2.1
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/2.1 by this push:
     new 806bdf9d91 fix failing NewTableConfigurationIT (#6037)
806bdf9d91 is described below

commit 806bdf9d91057cc8358278740422b7d398cbc564
Author: Kevin Rathbun <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Tue Dec 23 13:02:51 2025 -0500

    fix failing NewTableConfigurationIT (#6037)
---
 .../java/org/apache/accumulo/test/NewTableConfigurationIT.java    | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git 
a/test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/NewTableConfigurationIT.java 
b/test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/NewTableConfigurationIT.java
index db9564ff77..bf044eb385 100644
--- a/test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/NewTableConfigurationIT.java
+++ b/test/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/test/NewTableConfigurationIT.java
@@ -536,12 +536,12 @@ public class NewTableConfigurationIT extends 
SharedMiniClusterBase {
       var iterator1 = new IteratorSetting(20, "foo", "foo.bar");
       var exception = assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> 
client.tableOperations()
           .create(table, new 
NewTableConfiguration().attachIterator(iterator1)));
-      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("iterator priority 
conflict"));
+      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("conflict with default table 
iterator"));
       // add an iterator with same name as the default iterator
       var iterator2 = new IteratorSetting(10, "vers", "foo.bar");
       exception = assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> 
client.tableOperations()
           .create(table, new 
NewTableConfiguration().attachIterator(iterator2)));
-      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("iterator name conflict"));
+      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("conflict with default table 
iterator"));
       // try to attach the exact default iterators, should not present a 
conflict as they are
       // equivalent to what would be added
       IteratorConfigUtil.getInitialTableIteratorSettings().forEach((setting, 
scopes) -> {
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ public class NewTableConfigurationIT extends 
SharedMiniClusterBase {
       }
       exception = assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> 
client.tableOperations()
           .create(table2, new NewTableConfiguration().setProperties(props)));
-      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("iterator priority 
conflict"));
+      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("conflict with default table 
iterator"));
       props.clear();
       // add an iterator with same name as the default iterator
       for (IteratorScope iterScope : IteratorScope.values()) {
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ public class NewTableConfigurationIT extends 
SharedMiniClusterBase {
       }
       exception = assertThrows(IllegalStateException.class, () -> 
client.tableOperations()
           .create(table2, new NewTableConfiguration().setProperties(props)));
-      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("iterator name conflict"));
+      assertTrue(exception.getMessage().contains("conflict with default table 
iterator"));
       props.clear();
       // try to attach the exact default iterators, should not present a 
conflict as they are
       // equivalent to what would be added

Reply via email to