This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. dlmarion pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/accumulo-website.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 0d1fea1ae Accumulo 4.0 Feature Preview blog post (#441) 0d1fea1ae is described below commit 0d1fea1ae5e6878727770f7334c2621afdc7e812 Author: Dave Marion <dlmar...@apache.org> AuthorDate: Tue Oct 8 07:01:13 2024 -0400 Accumulo 4.0 Feature Preview blog post (#441) Co-authored-by: Dom Garguilo <domgargu...@apache.org> --- _posts/blog/2024-10-07-accumulo4-preview.md | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++ .../blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment1.png | Bin 0 -> 30785 bytes .../blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment2.png | Bin 0 -> 36242 bytes .../blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment3.png | Bin 0 -> 61210 bytes .../blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment4.png | Bin 0 -> 55056 bytes .../blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment5.png | Bin 0 -> 48132 bytes 6 files changed, 73 insertions(+) diff --git a/_posts/blog/2024-10-07-accumulo4-preview.md b/_posts/blog/2024-10-07-accumulo4-preview.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a4b88fa6b --- /dev/null +++ b/_posts/blog/2024-10-07-accumulo4-preview.md @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ +--- +title: "Accumulo 4.0 Feature Preview" +author: Dave Marion +--- + +## Background + +In version 2.1, we introduced two new optional and experimental features, [External Compactions](https://accumulo.apache.org/blog/2021/07/08/external-compactions.html) and [ScanServers](https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/2665). The External Compactions feature included two new server processes, the CompactionCoordinator and the Compactor. Using these new processes and their related configurations allows the user to perform major compactions on Tablets external to the TabletServer pr [...] + +The ScanServers feature included one new server process, the ScanServer, which allows users to execute scans against a Tablet external to the TabletServer. Because the ScanServer does not have access to the in-memory mutations within the TabletServer, we introduced a consistency level setting on the Scanner and BatchScanner where scans with the “immediate” consistency setting (default) would be sent to the TabletServer only and scans with the “eventual” consistency setting would be sent [...] + +## New For 4.0 + +The features in version 4.0 are intended to make running Accumulo in a cloud environment more cost-efficient by building on the optional and experimental features added in version 2.1. Prior to version 4.0, running an Accumulo instance required enough compute resources to host enough TabletServers to support the ingest, query, and Tablet maintenance (compact, split, merge, etc.) workload as Accumulo was originally designed to keep all Tablets immediately accessible all the time. Version [...] + +### On-Demand Tablets + +On an upgrade to Accumulo 4.0, the upgrade code will assign all Tablets (except for the root and metadata tables) with an availability setting of ONDEMAND. What this means is that the Tablet is not assigned and hosted by a TabletServer by default. If an operation is performed that requires a Tablet to be hosted by a TabletServer, then the operation will wait for the Tablet to be assigned and hosted. This setting can be changed and checked using the Shell commands `setavailability` and `g [...] + +User operations that would require a Tablet to be hosted are live ingest and immediate consistency scans. Users can still interact with data in unhosted tablets via bulk import and eventual consistency scans, and users can still perform tablet maintenance operations on unhosted tablets. The root and metadata tables have an availability value of HOSTED, which cannot be changed by the user. If your application only performs eventual scans and bulk imports, then only one TabletServer is req [...] + +Because Tablets are now optionally hosted in a TabletServer, the implementation of all the Tablet maintenance functions had to be moved out of the TabletServer and re-implemented. Split, Merge, and other metadata-only operations were re-implemented as Fate operations in the Manager. + +### External Compactions Only + +If a Tablet is not hosted, and the user is bulk importing to it, this could trigger the need for a major compaction. Hosting the Tablet just for the purpose of compacting it will cause churn on the cluster as the balancer may move Tablets around. This led to the decision to move all major compactions to the External Compactions feature. In 4.0, the CompactionCoordinator component was merged into the Manager process, so manually running the CompactionCoordinator process is no longer requi [...] + +### Resource Groups + +In version 4.0 a new group property can be supplied to the Compactor, ScanServer, and TabletServer processes (this replaces the “queue” property mentioned previously for Compactors). If not specified, the default group is used. These properties allow the user to create groups of processes with the same name that can be used to host Tablets, execute major compactions, and perform eventual scans. For example, application A may have requirements that dictate the need for immediate access to [...] + +### Increased Visibility + +Speaking of scaling, in version 4.0 we are emitting more metrics that can be used to determine when and how a resource needs to be scaled. The resource group and application name tags can be used to identify the group and type of resource that needs to be scaled. The metric name and value can be used to determine how the resource needs to be scaled. For example, if the value for metric `accumulo.compactor.queue.jobs.queued` is increasing, you likely need more Compactor resources. Likewis [...] + +## Possible Deployment Scenarios + +With the new features described above, many possible deployment scenarios are possible. We highlight a few of them below. + +### Scenario 1 + +The diagram below depicts the simplest deployment where all tables operate within the default group of resources. There are no ScanServers, so only immediate scans are available. Tablets for all tables are assigned, hosted, and balanced within the same set of TabletServers. Major compactions for all tablets are executed within the same set of Compactors. + + + +### Scenario 2 + +The diagram below depicts a slightly more complicated deployment where ScanServers are also being used to support eventual scans against Tablets. + + + +### Scenario 3 + +The diagram below depicts a deployment where multiple compactor groups are configured in the default resource group. The compaction configuration enables the user, for example, to send compactions to different groups based on the sum of the input file sizes. In this example we have two additional Compactor groups, default-small and default-large, that can be configured for some user tables. The Compactor group in the default resource group would be used for all other tables. See the [Ra [...] + + + +### Scenario 4 + +The diagram below depicts a scenario where a second resource group, app1, has been created to service Tablets for Tables associated with a particular application. The application can perform eventual and immediate consistent scans, and performs live ingest into the Tables, so it needs both ScanServers and TabletServers. The user would configure their application to perform eventual scans using the instructions in the ScanServer blog post, configure major compactions to run in the app1 Co [...] + + + +### Scenario 5 + +The diagram below is a slight modification to the prior scenario that shows the same app1 resource group, but without TabletServers. In this situation the associated application is only performing bulk imports and eventual scans on table data. + + + +## Current State and Path Forward + +Version 4.0.0-SNAPSHOT has been merged into the main branch. We have added over 100 new integration tests and all of the old and new tests are passing. We are planning on performing testing at increasing scales to determine what other architectural changes are needed. For example, we have discussed the possibility of needing to run multiple active Manager processes as the Manager is now responsible for performing more functions (CompactionCoordinator, more Fate operations, etc.). + diff --git a/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment1.png b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment1.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9af24857c Binary files /dev/null and b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment1.png differ diff --git a/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment2.png b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment2.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..183ff8b16 Binary files /dev/null and b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment2.png differ diff --git a/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment3.png b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment3.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1e6eeb93b Binary files /dev/null and b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment3.png differ diff --git a/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment4.png b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment4.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fd4595aa8 Binary files /dev/null and b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment4.png differ diff --git a/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment5.png b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment5.png new file mode 100644 index 000000000..751cac58d Binary files /dev/null and b/images/blog/202409_accumulo4/AccumuloDeployment5.png differ