On 2016-06-17 1:26 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:

> The fix does not impact compatibility, because the improvement does
> not depend on the encoder doing anything special. I also do not see
> any case where an encoder could have effectively used the current
> broken behaviour to improve quality over the proposed change.

I support adding this refinement to the update draft.

 -r

_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec

Reply via email to