On 2/16/16 6:27 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote: > Joel Jaeggli wrote: >> Scott Bradner performed the OPSdir review. >> >> There was an ask for a paragraph covering the following >> >> That said, I wonder if it would be possible to as a OAM-like ability to >> support "in-band" condition information - for example by adding an OAM >> channel to the channel mapping function (i.e. the "Opus Channel Mapping >> Families" registry) where the definition would be that the channel is for >> the use of OAM services and is otherwise passed unmodified. Having the >> ability to have real time "what the customer is seeing" RTCP like, but >> with more expansion abilities, feedback could be quite helpful >> operations-wise >> >> which has not yet come to conclusion. > > I'll attempt to summarize where I think the discussion currently is: > both Scott and I agreed that it is probably too late in the process to > make changes to the channel mappings in this document, and that could be > done later via the IANA registry. A general paragraph stating that > someone should be thinking about OAM type things would be welcome, but I > don't feel qualified to write one, and we currently lack a volunteer to > do so.
yup, I don't hold a discuss so I'm not an obstacle to progress, but if we come up with that either collectively or indivudally then great.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
