On 3 Feb 2016, at 9:52, Ben Campbell wrote:
On 2 Feb 2016, at 22:19, Timothy B. Terriberry wrote:
[...]
It seems to me like putting a BSD copyright header in an XML comment
at the top of the XML source file and dropping Section 13 from the
draft would resolve all of the issues, if everyone agrees that is an
acceptable thing to do. Ron?
I think that's acceptable in theory. In practice, keep in mind that if
someone uses xml2rfc to render the text, it's going to create IETF
headers and boilerplate, at least if the "external" version of the XML
uses the same settings.
That's probably not what you want, regardless of whether the section
13 language stays or goes.
To clarify: I think that would only matter for versions with modified
content.
[...]
_______________________________________________
codec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
