On 2014-08-30 9:21 AM, Ron wrote: > All [sec. 10] says is they are 'not strictly "Ogg Opus files"'
We do use the phrase "Ogg Opus files" in section 5.2.1 as well, so you could argue either way. I want that flexibility so unless there's an objection I'll limit use of that term to section 10. It's nevertheless true that implementations of this draft have so far been focussed on a single logical stream per chain segment. -r _______________________________________________ codec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec
