Hello Adam, Adam Williamson [2020-09-03 11:41 -0700]: > Ahh, sorry, I was misinterpreting the test failure - I forgot a little > wrinkle about what it does at the point where it failed. What's changed > is actually just that the "Requires" text looks a bit different now > than it used to. What I forgot is that if that doesn't match, the test > does a little fallback check whether it actually didn't reach the > "service details" screen at all and is still at the "Services" screen > (this is a thing that happened at one point, sometimes the click got > eaten or something); that was throwing me off. Never mind, then, sorry > again!
Please don't be sorry, we are really grateful for the additional verification! I just feel sad about breaking it all the time with little PatternFly design changes. That "click got eaten" fallback sounds worrisome, though -- does that still happen? We did have a few cases in Cockpit where clicks had *two* effects instead of one, like immediately closing a dialog again. But that sounds different than your description. Thanks! Martin _______________________________________________ cockpit-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
