OK, I see, extras VS base, thanks Martin!
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 12:47 PM Martin Pitt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello Yigal, > > Yigal Korman [2019-02-06 8:32 +0200]: > > Anyone knows why RHEL 7.6 provides v173.1 while CentOS has a newer v176? > > Usually packages have the same version on both... > > They do, but you have to consider Base vs. Extras. Both RHEL 7.6 and CentOS > 7.3 > have Cockpit 173 in base > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/ > > and some cockpit-* version 176 in Extras: > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/ > > It's a bit confusing as e. g. cockpit-bridge 176 isn't supposed to be there -- > that's a Base package. Apparently CentOS publishes all built packages from 176 > without filtering them out the way RHEL 7 does. > > This is fixed in RHEL 8, as the packages are not built on the srpm level, > instead of relying on post-build compose filters. > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > cockpit-devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] _______________________________________________ cockpit-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
