On Thu, 2019-10-03 at 17:08 -0400, stefan wrote:
> Yes, that is exactly what I'm trying to do, but it doesn't seem to
> have any effect. That is, `dpkg --info ...` doesn't list the
> additional dependency, and correspondingly, running `apt-get install
> ...` on the component package file will install the package without
> first installing the prerequisite component.
> Consider this declaration:
>   set(CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL runtime development mstool)
> If I now write
>   set(CPACK_COMPONENT_DEVELOPMENT_DEPENDS runtime)
> I will see no effect. That is, the "development" package still does
> not depend on the "runtime" package.
> So I try this:
>   set(CPACK_COMPONENT_DEVELOPMENT_DEPENDS RUNTIME)
> in case capitalization is required. Now the "runtime" component seems
> to get packaged twice (as per the cmake logs), but still no correct
> dependencies.
> Is it time for a bug report ?

Please send us a minimal CMakeLists.txt that reproduces the issue.

Kyle
-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to