Ruslan Baratov writes: > On 20-Dec-15 01:31, Magnus Therning wrote: >> Ruslan Baratov writes: >> >>> How about using RelWithDebInfo? See: >>> http://stackoverflow.com/a/28124715/2288008 >> Hmm, I'm probably missing something but how does that solve the issue >> with some targets requiring NDEBUG to be *undefined* and other targets >> requiring NDEBUG to be defined? > I don't think that building targets with different NDEBUG values is a > good idea. More correct approach will be to introduce custom macro to > allow checks (i.e. FOO_NDEBUG/FOO_DEBUG).
Why not? /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0x927912051716CE39 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all that we need to make us happy is something to be enthusiastic about. -- Albert Einstein
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
