Hello, i’m curious about 2 things and therefore wanted to ask: When i use qt5_add_resources and some of my resources change they get recompiled during the next invocation of my build tool. Whereas when i use cmakes autorcc this is not the case.
Secondly, with qt5_wrap_cpp every file gets processed in parallel – well, because they don’t depend on each other. In contrast, automoc mocs everything in sequence (for one target) which is a noticeable bottleneck on an 8 core machine. As i’ve found, the reasoning for the automoc case seems to be, that unconstrained parallelization will flood the machine and setting up logic to constrain that is not the goal. Shouldn’t cmake just generate independent build targets and let the build system handle the parallelization? I couldn’t find anything about the autorcc case though. automoc and autorcc are supposed to replace their corresponding macros and potentially be better than them. Is there something i’m missing? Regards, Norbert Pfeiler.
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake
