On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Johannes Zarl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 17. October 2013, 07:12:51, Clark WANG wrote: > > When I'm using CMake more and more I find it's not a real serious > > "language". It's so tricky. > > I can see why you are frustrated. I don't think it's all bad though. > Hopefully > CMake3 will be used for some language cleanups at the expense of breaking > some > backwards-compatibility... > The 3.0 (now rc1) release notes<http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.0/release/3.0.0.html>did not mention about these kinds of things. :( > > Johannes > -- > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: > http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ > > Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more > information on each offering, please visit: > > CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html > CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html > CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake >
-- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more information on each offering, please visit: CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
