2012/6/27 hce <jupiter....@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on > http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Component-Package-Name-td6976896.html > where Eric Noulard pointed out that we could not control component package > name for the reason of unique package name. I am currently running on 2.8.8 > and generated very funny component package name: > > foo-1.1-1.0.el6.x86_64-FooComponent.rpm, it basically set by following > format: > > ${CPACK_PACKAGE_NAME}-${CPACK_PACKAGE_VERSION}-${CPACK_SYSTEM_NAME}-${COMPONENT_NAME}.rpm > > That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the > component package name in 2.8.8?
Not yet see: http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997 Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either. I know it will be useful for many of us, I just lack time to go through it. The work is not that difficult but it has many potential impact so that we shall take time to do it carefully. > BTW, when I build two packages foo-1.1 and , the bin-1.2, the CPack > generates an extra Unspecified package, theCPackConfig.cmake set: > > SET(CPACK_COMPONENTS_ALL > "foo-1.1-1.0.el6.x86_64;bin-1.2-1.el6.x86_6;Unspecified") > > Where the Unspecified come from and now can I fix it? As Micha said, this comes from an INSTALL statement which does not contains COMPONENT. see http://www.vtk.org/Wiki/CMake:Component_Install_With_CPack#Specificying_components_and_groups or this recent discussion: http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2012-June/050855.html -- Erk Le gouvernement représentatif n'est pas la démocratie -- http://www.le-message.org -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
