On Friday 30 December 2011, Eric Noulard wrote: > 2011/12/30 David Cole <david.c...@kitware.com>: > > There is no conservative course here. There is a choice of whether to > > make CMake 2.8.7 behave the same as 2.8.6 or the same as 2.8.5. > > > > For this to be a showstopper it would have had to be reported before we > > tagged 2.8.6 -- since it is now already in 2.8.6, it should simply be > > considered a bug that we will try to address as soon as possible and get > > it merged into master in time for the following release. > > > > It would also be nice if this were more than simply a back-and-forth > > discussion between you and I. I would sure appreciate more input from > > other LAPACK and BLAS clients. > > May be no-so-simple Find modules > (FindLAPACK is 307 lines long and FindBLAS is 624 lines long) > deserve a dedicated dashboard. > The interested user could setup a submission to this dashboard for their > favorite software build such that testing would be more systematic. > > May be it could be done with some ctest scripts that would submit > the update/configure/build/test of the interested project to > this "FindLAPACK" dashboard?
Yes, having something like this would be great, also for other complex find- modules as Qt4 or Boost. But AFAIK there is not yet such a setup existing. Alex -- Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
