HI everybody, I'm sure some of you are already aware of the Gyp project (at least Bill since he responded on this thread):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg11029.html I think there are many good ideas/improvements/inspiration that should be taken into account to drive future development of CMake. In particular, I am thinking about point 2, 5 and maybe 3 of the first part of the post. In general, I am wondering why the Gyp's staff decided to start Gyp instead of improving CMake by submitting patches whereas they "had even started a speculative port" (as mentioned at the beginning of the post). Since the time I know CMake, this community have always welcomed improvements and patches in order to support large projects such as KDE and Boost, so why not for Chrome/Webkit. That being said, I feel sad to see other CMake's like projects started instead of contributing. Regards, -- Nicolas Desprès _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
