There may possibly be renewed support for a "CMakeified" version of Boost. Boost 1.44 was just released and it looks like at least one individual "http://gitorious.org/~denisarnaud/boost/denisarnauds-zeuners-boost-cmake/commits/1.44.0-denis " is keeping the boost-cmake up-to-date with the latest boost from SVN. The problem that occurs is that with the defaults that the boost- cmake project uses for installation there is some deviation from the official Boost-bjam based builds. Namely boost-cmake uses versioned include and library directories: $BOOST_ROOT/include/boost-1.44.0/ and $BOOST_ROOT/lib/boost-1.44.0 The current FindBoost.cmake does not know to look for these directories and so if someone builds boost with boost-cmake and then tries to use that installation with CMake 2.8.2 to "find_package(Boost ....)" it will not find boost.

There are just a few extra lines to be added to the FindBoost.cmake file to alleviate this "disconnect". There are also "BoostConfig.cmake" and "BoostConfigVersion.cmake" files included in the boost-cmake distribution which I supposed is useful.

Thoughts?
___________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer       mike.jack...@bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio

On Tuesday 06 Jul 2010 12:01:17 am David Cole wrote:
Hi all,

Now that we have released CMake 2.8.2 last Monday, and we have switched to this new workflow using branches in the git repository, *now* would be a
great time to prioritize bug fixes for the next release of CMake.

We are leaning towards quarterly releases from now on, scheduling them
every 3 months. That would make the next release of CMake version 2.8.3
and scheduled to have an "rc1" release candidate in approximately
mid-September, 2010.

If you have a particular issue that you think should be fixed for inclusion in 2.8.3, please bring it up now. Ideally, each issue will be discussed as needed on the mailing list to come to any consensus about what should be done to fix it, and then an entry in the bug tracker may be used to keep it
on the radar screen, and to track activity related to it.

Patches are always welcome. Patches that include testing of any new
features, or tests that prove a bug is really fixed on the dashboards,
basically any patch with testing is preferred over a patch with no testing. Also, if you are *adding* code, then you also probably need to add *tests*
of that code, so that the coverage percentage stays as is or rises.

Please discuss issues here as needed, and add notes to existing issues in the bug tracker that you are interested in seeing fixed for 2.8.3 -- we
will be looking at the mailing list and activity in the bug tracker to
help prioritize the bug fixes that will occur in the next several weeks.


Thanks,
David Cole
Kitware, Inc.

_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to