On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Michael Wild <them...@gmail.com> wrote: > If CMake made the choice, somebody (i.e. exactly ONE person) would be a happy > camper, all the others would have froth in front of their mouths...
Why? > It is trivial to add the decoration yourself, if you must wrap add_executable > and add_library in a custom function which sets the properties appropriately. Sounds like tons of code duplication, which might be trivial but is not a good thing. >> >>> And yes, especially as a library developer you have to be aware of things. >> >> Why? > > A library developer has to think of everything. Otherwise the library is > useless. Everything is a big word. Of course I disagree with you. Ever heard of abstractions? They're there so one doesn't have to bother with all the details. With CMake, I don't have to think about how to build stuff on tons of different platforms, CMake abstracts that for me. I don't see why it can't do the same for naming. Olaf _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
