Hi,

On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:34:57PM -0400, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote:
> Which leads me to the important part of my mail:
> 
> I believe that the scripts should be handled in a more prominent way now than 
> simply
> having them mentioned in the Wiki.
> Thus:
> 
> a) where to host them?
>   - CMake repository
>   - SourceForge, gitorious, Berlios, ...
> 
> b) which license to use?
> Jesper tended towards GPL-like, and I'm also less of a BSD/X11 fan
> 
> 
> For hosting, I think it would actually be a good idea to have them in CMake 
> repository as well,
> since one could argue that there's a pretty strong match.
> 
> Coming from a proprietary project (carrying my "proprietary project" hat ;),
> my preference is to be able to freely use the scripts in any proprietary 
> project,
> but to make sure that any further proprietary use is required to contribute 
> back
> any modifications once delivered to customers.
> Thus licensing as GPL seems out of the question (though not entirely sure
> how a special "script project" would be affected by GPL regulations),
> and LGPL seems to be the goal. Rrrright!?

Any suggestions, anyone?
Otherwise I'll simply opt for the SF project variant and LGPL very soon...

Thanks,

Andreas Mohr
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake

Reply via email to