Zitat von Yegor Yefremov <yegor_s...@visionsystems.de>:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Zitat von Yegor Yefremov <yegor_s...@visionsystems.de>:
are these two statements not doubled?
+#elif defined(__GNU__) && defined(__ELF__) && defined(__ARMEL__)
+# define ABI_ID "ELF ARM"
+#elif defined(__GNU__) && defined(__ELF__) && defined(__ARMEL__)
+# define ABI_ID "ELF ARM"
One of them should be __ARMEB__ instead of __ARMEL__, I guess.
Like "ARM, Endian little" and ".. big" ?
Yes.
Those lines should either have "&& !defined(__ARM_EABI__) or the EABI
detection should be before those.
Citation from http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort:
"Naming
At the Extremadura emdebian meeting, 12-16 April 2006, the name
"armel" was chosen. If a bigendian arm EABI port will be created, it
will be called "armeb", and it will replace the previous
oldabi-based "armeb" port effort."
From a compiler POV, the Debian port naming is not relevant ;)
HS
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
