On 29.09.09 21:20:02, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Alexander Neundorf > <a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > I guess we will with it, because I don't really see a difference between > > source compatibility for C++ files and for CMake files. In both cases, if > > it's broken, the package will not compile. > > Do we promise source compatibility for C++ files? I thought we only > promised *binary* compatibility through KDE 4.x but not *source*.
We promise source compat for public header files. Source compat for non-public c++ code (that inclused .cpp and .h) doesn't make any sense. And FindFoo.cmake is like a public header file containing only inline-code. Andreas -- Your lucky number is 3552664958674928. Watch for it everywhere. _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
