On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Ingolf Steinbach < [email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/9/18 Bill Hoffman <[email protected]>: > > If someone has a reasonable set of places to look we can add them. Does > the > > boost installer set any registry values? > > Not sure about that. Unfortunately, there is no installer for 1.40.0 > yet; and 1.40 seems to be somewhat different than previous releases -- > at least with respect to library naming. > Thankfully, the changes made to library naming in 1.40 do not break FindBoost. :) > My intention was: there are already some typical paths hard coded in > FindBoost. When the module finds that one of those paths does exist in > the file system, would it be possible to search that path a bit harder > (for instance evaluate subdirectories) for the requested Boost > version? > Could you post what you have in mind for the paths? Also, bear in mind that Boost already encodes versions into the include directory and libraries. It isn't necessary to segment a boost install prefix by version number at all. Ultimately we can add anything to the search path of FindBoost that makes sense. If you have suggestions, please feel free to submit them (preferably with a tested patch) to the bugtracker. -- Philip Lowman
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
