On Sunday 23 November 2008 17:43:53 cyril_wobow wrote: > Sure, I guess we are all here because CMake is a very powerful suite, > with tons of functionalities and useful abstractions. But I challenge > anyone to seriously tell me that he/she enjoys writing CMake script. As > soon as you don't have to only set a bunch of variables and call a few > built-in macros any more, you get crazy. Do a bit of string processing, > you get crazy. Write/call your own functions and macros, with argument > passing and returning, you get crazy.
I haven't had problems reading CMake files yet. Maybe it depends on the
programmer who writes the CMake files. My first CMake project was Wengophone
(now Qutecom).
> To me, that is definitely THE weakest point of CMake, along with its
> fairly arnarchic documentation.
Well I've started to learn CMake just with reading the manpage. All you need
is in there. Well there are some people who are not used to read manpages. I
think that is the problem.
However there is #cmake @ freenode for those who need help.
Cheers,
-- andreas
--
http://www.cynapses.org/ - cybernetic synapses
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
