Alexander Neundorf schrieb:
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Christian Hoffmann wrote:
...
Thanks for the quick answer! The reply-delay in this list is just awesome!
It possible to perform it at compile-time, but itwould take *very* long -
Do you mean "at compile time" or was it a typo and you meant "at cmake time" ?
Ups, that definitely was a typo. Luckily, I meant cmake-time.
much longer than the actual compile and link process. But - why not? Im am
Independent from when you run it, it will in both cases take long. I don't see
the issue here.
Of course. The point is more that you can't see the feedback from E when
running it at cmake time...
just trying this approach. it seems to work. Is there some way to send the
output of the command BOTH to an output variable AND to the screen? As the
computation takes quite long, it would be nice to see the progression
report of the called process.
Not really. You can print it on the screen once it has finished.
If you can modify E, you could have it print to both stdout and stderr, and
capture only one of the two
I also thought of that solution. I already started a hard fight with the
regexps in order to grab the names of the generated sources from the (verbose)
output of E. By splitting it to stdout AND stderr, i can also solve that
problem quickly.
Thanks for the good idea and the quick reply!
Chris
_______________________________________________
CMake mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
