On 8/10/07, Bill Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brandon Van Every wrote: > > > > http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1118.html > > > I am not sure this means static libraries are deprecated. It just > means that completely static > executables are not recommended. They want you to use the dynamic run > time libraries. > This is very similar to the MS compiler. However, your application can > use lots of static > libraries that contain your code.
The OS X linker will go out of its way to sabotage your code. If you have a static and a dynamic library of the same rootname in your path, it will always prefer the dynamic library, no matter what flags you specify. libtool does some kind of dance to get around this; CMake does not. If Apple is going to be that heavy handed with their linker, then as far as I'm concerned, they're aggressively anti-static and you're opening up cans 'o' worms going against them. I suppose static libs under my own control that link against dynamic runtimes are possible, but I'm not a Mac guy and do not deeply care about the issue. I adopted the expedient of suppressing static anything in Chicken's Mac build. Cheers, Brandon Van Every _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list CMake@cmake.org http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
