On Friday 01 June 2007 14:14, Eric Noulard wrote: > 2007/6/1, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ... > > especially when you have debugging / maintenance questions for the > > mailing list. Otherwise, you'll have to turn all your macros and > > wrappers back into straight CMake code before you can ask anyone > > anything. > > I disagree here. > I personnally like the CMake MACRO very much because > its a good way to "extend or customize", 'strait' CMake code. > Nevertheless you are right when the bug is in the MACRO > you need help from the MACRO writer or you need to dive > in the MACRO.
I think there is no "right" way, both have advantages and disadvantages. When writing the macros for KDE4 I tried to keep them to a minimum and make them behave and look as similar to the builtin cmake commands/macros as possible. IMO also with macros the cmake scripts should still be understandable with normal cmake knowledge. Bye Alex _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
