-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 John Biddiscombe wrote: > No real consolation or assistance, but I complained to our sysadmins > that we had very slow builds from slave nodes, but fast from the master. > I did some timing to give them something to aim for and it was > > Master node : configure+generate = 25 seconds (file system is fibre > channel or something almost local) > Slave node : configure+generate = 210 seconds (file system is nfs) > > A factor of almost 10! And really just because the dependency checking > and makefile writes etc use IO heavily... > > Just so you know that it's not a samba specific problem, anything over > NFS is affected.
Thanks for the benchmarks. For some reasons my NFS configure+generate is pretty damn quick compared to my SMB configure+generate. They are for different configurations though, Makefile vs. VS7. I'm pretty sure my initial NFS configuration will be slow but subsequent reconfigurations are fast (files have been cached) which is why I'm so confused why Windows can't perform similarly. Maybe Windows just has performance problems in this arena. Oh well. We've been looking for a good excuse to switch the rest of our development team over to Linux anyways ;) - -- Philip Lowman Simulation Development Engineer, Modeling and Simulation Technology General Dynamics Land Systems http://www.gdls.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGBCz8e0tOktX6RKkRAkj0AJwIdLcgljhPMQdXvpP9KpNuDMymKgCfRALH F/yfepkT3RVVzJeXPc6lmco= =RbJM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CMake mailing list [email protected] http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
