On 2014-10-03 08:56, Brad King wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 06:08 PM, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>> Please see also
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=14915 which it sounds like
>> this (partly) fixes; you may want to reference that in your patch or
>> vice versa.
> 
> I've applied the patch here and added the issue reference:
> 
>  Ninja: Use 'console' pool for CMake re-run if possible (#14915)
>  http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=9f32a241
> 
>> (The "partly" is that the request is also for the 'install' target to
>> use the console pool; not sure if you did that, want to tackle that,
>> etc., but in any case this is a step in the right direction.)
> 
> I'll leave that to a follow-up patch if anyone wants to do it.

I was sort-of hoping / encouraging that Sylvain might be interested :-).
Anyway, thanks!

(Re-running CMake is the more important task, I think, as that's known
to take minutes in some cases... install, while also an obvious
candidate for such treatment, I believe tends to be quicker, so it less
"important".)

-- 
Matthew

-- 

Powered by www.kitware.com

Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: 
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ

Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more 
information on each offering, please visit:

CMake Support: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html
CMake Consulting: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html
CMake Training Courses: http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers

Reply via email to