On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 11:31:59 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote: > Yes we are aware of this and we do not intend to pursue since it offers > nothing in the way of real benefits. > > > It does seem potentially useful to third party efforts around bootstrapped > ClojureScript, but that's about it.
I don't have an understanding of the tradeoffs involved, but given the little bit of semantic and practical funkiness involved in macros being compiled in Clojure and run in Clojurescript, I would have thought that moving to an all Javascript/Clojurescript system could possibly be a good thing in the long run. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
