No. This only about the convenience of aliasing core common namespaces that only differ by name between Clojure and ClojureScript.
David On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Herwig Hochleitner <[email protected]> wrote: > 2016-06-02 4:54 GMT+02:00 David Nolen <[email protected]>: >> >> We are considering aliasing support for cljs.spec. That is rewriting >> clojure.spec vars in ClojureScript sources to cljs.spec but it will likely >> cover more than just cljs.spec - cljs.test, cljs.pprint etc. >> > > Interesting. Is this on the table as a general alternative for supporting > .cljc in macros? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
