Thank you for help. Still no success even with given examples. I will study this and second example from Zubair. This all is too complicated. I can understand why you have to explicitly refer all functions and macros which will be in use. But all the rest like issue with macros should be automated.
With regards, Olek On Saturday, 2 April 2016 22:32:49 UTC+2, Mike Fikes wrote: > Hi Olek, > > The first argument to `eval`—the compiler state—would need to have metadata > regarding your `sstr` function. Since the state is empty, you run into a > problem. (As a quick aside, there is no need to write your own `eval-str` > that calls `eval`—one exists in `cljs.js`.) > > Frequently, for REPLs and other use cases, the compiler state is kept in a > top-level def, and the same state passed back in. (This causes the compiler > state to be mutated to incorporate new definitions that are encountered when > evaluating things.) > > But, in your case, you want to call a function in the very same namespace > that is hosting your code. One interesting solution to this is in Chris > Ford's Klangmeister project. Have a look in the code in this area to see how > he does it using some cleverness with macros: > https://github.com/ctford/klangmeister/tree/master/src/klangmeister/compile > > With respect to your last question: If I understand, most definitely "yes". > All of the evaluation / execution with self-hosted ClojureScript is happening > in the target JavaScript engine (no need for runtime support in the back-end > server.) > > - Mike -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
