On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 7:24:15 PM UTC+10, Daniel Compton wrote: > Are you using Re-com as well? That relies heavily on Flexbox which is only > just starting to be optimised in Firefox. I think Firefox 38 from memory was > where it started to get better performance, although still not as fast as > Chrome. The other tip is to look at the rendering timeline and see which > parts of code/browser events are taking the most time. I'm most familiar with > Chrome's one, but I assume that Firefox has a similar one.
Yeah, this is a good point. The flexbox implementation in Firefox v39 is fast (just released). But the previous v38 is dog slow if flexbox is used. If you are using flexbox, then this could be a significant issue. Make sure you are using Firefox 39. -- Mike -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
