I'm not using Om and this was a general question about whether or not CLJS supports the concept of a folder-structure-invariant namespace. Sounds like baggage from Java land, which may be am advantage in the general case.
But now I'm intrigued by ref cursors in Om.:) Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 26, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Leon Grapenthin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Again, I recommend you to look at ref cursors. The general portion black om > magic I use for this is: > > Put the app-state atom in :shared when mounting under a key you like. > > Then write a simple wrapper about the fns exposed for ref cursoring so that > you can access any portion of the app-state you like as a ref cursor from the > current components owner. > > The only caveat is that you need some cursor available at the korks you are > creating your ref cursor at. If nothing is there, you can't create a ref > cursor from it. > > > https://github.com/omcljs/om/wiki/Advanced-Tutorial#reference-cursors > > I think ref cursors are of great utility if used sparsely, e. g. for things > like the currently signed in user. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
