As it says. I had a hurried look through earlier postings for some discussion of this, without success.
Macros eventually all expand to CLJS-compatible code. Currently, IIUC, both macro definition and expansion are handled by the Clojure compiler, with the resulting code (presumably CLJS compatible) being handed back to the ClojureScript compiler. Was this simply a convenience to get CLJS working with a minimum of fuss, or are there some structural impediments? -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
