Thanks for the info. Sablono goes a long way, but yeah, you still have om/build. On 14 Dec 2014 14:32, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Just adding to the description of API differences: with reagent one is > able to use clojure's (for ...) to iteratively generate subcomponents, > without the need for an additional lib-specific API. > > This is a minor convenience but, grouped with the differences Mike listed, > the end effect (for me) was that I was able to reason about reagent > components without even being familiar with its API, because it's stuff I > already knew from clojure and hiccup. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/eRjfLnQP2Us/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
