Agree that should be on compiler level. Relying to third-party solution does not improve situation: without them, I have a possibility to forget to include externs, with third-party solutions I have a possibility to forget to include them (also library author will have to choose whose convention to support).
My proposal: Cljs-compiler should just include every 'externs.js' file it can found on the classpath on top level. Library authors: just include externs.js to the jar at top level Library consumers: just add dependency (as you normally do) and it’ll put externs.js to the classpath where it could be seen by compiler. Any thoughts? Who can make such a decision? I can work on an implementation. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
