I've got a question about pro/cons of writing Om components in two different
ways. The first way uses higher-order functions:
(defn input-component
[{:keys [app-state-key class-name]}]
(fn [data owner]
(reify
om/IRenderState
(render-state [this state]
; ...
The second way uses the options argument: (borrowed from the instrument example
in Om):
(defn something-else
[original owner opts]
(reify
om/IRender
(render [_]
(dom/div #js {:style #js {:border "1px solid #ccc" :padding "5px"}}
(dom/div nil
(dom/span nil "Path:")
(dom/pre #js {:style #js {:display "inline-block"}}
(pr-str (om/path (second original)))))
(apply om/build* original)))))
What are the pros/cons of the two approaches? Apologies if this is already
written up somewhere -- if so, could you kindly point me to it?
For example, are there differences that affect rendering after state changes?
Thanks,
David
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
