I've got no compiler-fu to speak of but the increase in size is due to schema.core defining a lot of Protocols/Types on "native" types. They are checked at runtime and therefore require basically the rest of cljs.core (I guess).
But I wouldn't worry about it, the size is due to cljs.core (persistent colls, protocols, etc.) being included which you are going to be using anyways, so there is little dead code to eliminate. Also 128k should compress nicely down to about 20k which is basically nothing. I have an app in production with quite a lot more features than its coffeescript predecessor but it is still a lot smaller in size. I was worried before I started too, but in practice it still beats every jquery soup project by a large margin. Not only in size. ;) Cheers, /thomas -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
